<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe ESPN Won&#8217;t Be Getting More Soccer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davesfootballblog.com/post/2010/01/06/maybe-espn-wont-be-getting-more-soccer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davesfootballblog.com/post/2010/01/06/maybe-espn-wont-be-getting-more-soccer/</link>
	<description>It's always football season somewhere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:49:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davesfootballblog.com/post/2010/01/06/maybe-espn-wont-be-getting-more-soccer/comment-page-1/#comment-130698</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davesfootballblog.com/?p=5225#comment-130698</guid>
		<description>Jarrett: I have my doubts that Fox is doing this for the rugby. Sure, this deal would give Fox the seven biggest union properties -- Rugby World Cup, Six Nations, Tri-Nations, Heineken Cup, Guinness Premiership, Magner&#039;s League and Super 14 -- but the market for these just isn&#039;t that big in this country. Hell, Invictus is floundering at the box office. Most of these are going to get sold off cheaply to other networks -- maybe ESPN360 can build a rugby union section -- or shifted to PPV. (IIRC, Six Nations is already PPV.)

And I actually do think Fox could fill a second network with 24/7 soccer. They&#039;ll have at least two confederations&#039; Champions Leagues (and possibly a third if they start doing those Copa Lib matches on FSE in English) and domestic leagues in England, Italy, Scotland, France, Holland, Russia, Argentina, Australia &amp; the USA. That includes 1st &amp; 2nd division for both England &amp; USA. They also have the Club World Cup, the FA Cup &amp; Carling Cup, the WPS, various FIFA &amp; UEFA youth events, and plenty of college soccer -- not to mention the all-important Beach Soccer World Cup. (In HD!) Add in some league-created highlight packages and some Sky Sports News, and it could be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarrett: I have my doubts that Fox is doing this for the rugby. Sure, this deal would give Fox the seven biggest union properties &#8212; Rugby World Cup, Six Nations, Tri-Nations, Heineken Cup, Guinness Premiership, Magner&#8217;s League and Super 14 &#8212; but the market for these just isn&#8217;t that big in this country. Hell, Invictus is floundering at the box office. Most of these are going to get sold off cheaply to other networks &#8212; maybe ESPN360 can build a rugby union section &#8212; or shifted to PPV. (IIRC, Six Nations is already PPV.)</p>
<p>And I actually do think Fox could fill a second network with 24/7 soccer. They&#8217;ll have at least two confederations&#8217; Champions Leagues (and possibly a third if they start doing those Copa Lib matches on FSE in English) and domestic leagues in England, Italy, Scotland, France, Holland, Russia, Argentina, Australia &#038; the USA. That includes 1st &#038; 2nd division for both England &#038; USA. They also have the Club World Cup, the FA Cup &#038; Carling Cup, the WPS, various FIFA &#038; UEFA youth events, and plenty of college soccer &#8212; not to mention the all-important Beach Soccer World Cup. (In HD!) Add in some league-created highlight packages and some Sky Sports News, and it could be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett C.</title>
		<link>http://www.davesfootballblog.com/post/2010/01/06/maybe-espn-wont-be-getting-more-soccer/comment-page-1/#comment-130697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davesfootballblog.com/?p=5225#comment-130697</guid>
		<description>My other thought on this...what if the Plus doesn&#039;t mean &quot;more soccer&quot; but means &quot;more than soccer&quot;.  Perhaps they are simply &quot;rebranding&quot; Fox Soccer into Fox Soccer Plus which would allow them to show rugby and gaelic sports content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My other thought on this&#8230;what if the Plus doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;more soccer&#8221; but means &#8220;more than soccer&#8221;.  Perhaps they are simply &#8220;rebranding&#8221; Fox Soccer into Fox Soccer Plus which would allow them to show rugby and gaelic sports content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett C.</title>
		<link>http://www.davesfootballblog.com/post/2010/01/06/maybe-espn-wont-be-getting-more-soccer/comment-page-1/#comment-130696</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davesfootballblog.com/?p=5225#comment-130696</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Perhaps this will be like the Setanta Xtra channel on DirecTV...dark most of the time but going live when there are multiple live events to simulcast.  

Can they really fill a whole other channel with soccer content?

I was thinking that perhaps this was the opportunity for the WWL to launch an ESPN International Channel here in the States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Perhaps this will be like the Setanta Xtra channel on DirecTV&#8230;dark most of the time but going live when there are multiple live events to simulcast.  </p>
<p>Can they really fill a whole other channel with soccer content?</p>
<p>I was thinking that perhaps this was the opportunity for the WWL to launch an ESPN International Channel here in the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
