Oct 10 2008
Fiscal Responsibility
So I had this brilliant idea at the beginning of the year.
AOL never took any taxes out of the checks they sent me for my work at FanHouse, which resulted in a $2,000+ tax bill from the IRS last April. So in an attempt to avoid such a tax bill for 2008, I decided to put more money from my day job into my 401(k). That would give me a nice big tax break. Combined with a full year’s worth of mortgage interest from two fix-rate home loans — thankfully, I never bought into the ARM hype that’s ruining everything now — I might get that tax bill pretty close to zero.
Yeah, take a look at how brilliant that plan was:
Every penny I put into this 401(k) from the start of the year? Gone. Every penny my employer matched? Gone. I’ll probably lose more before the market hits bottom. I might as well have kept the cash, given the IRS the twenty Bens and bought a nice HDTV. Meanwhile, the government just passed that stupid bailout package, which will cost me another $2,500 as a taxpayer.
Some people are looking to spread blame — hilariously, in some cases — but I’m not going to sweat this too much, because when it all comes down right to it, I’m doing a hell of a lot better than the clubs in the Premier League.
Various sources have reported that Premier League clubs have racked up a whopping £3 billion in debt in the last few years. The clubs in the most debt? The Big Four, of course. With all that Champions League cash coming in, they could secure plenty of banks loans on their future success.
All those loans, however, have left many clubs on very shaky ground — so much so that UEFA is considering banning clubs from the Champions League for carry too much debt. This is a policy that will enrich nobody but the lawyers that the most heavily leveraged clubs will hire to have it struck down in the courts. After all, UEFA created this environment in the first place. The Champions League is so huge that clubs will risk everything to chase European glory, and the free market economy will let them. Now Michel Platini wants to take that away on a whim in an effort to “save football?” Kitteh not goin back in bag, Mr. Platini.
Liverpool and Manchester United clearly have the most to lose from UEFA’s attempt to hoist fiscal responsibility on clubs. Roman Abramovich could sneeze away Chelsea’s £765M debt at any moment if he wanted, and Arsenal’s shiny new stadium is bringing in an extra £3M per match, so they’re having no trouble paying down those bonds they issued to finance it. Liverpool and Man United, however, are heavily leveraged on future success. Take away the filthy UEFA lucre, and where are they?
I suppose it’s no coincidence that both Liverpool and Man United are currently owned by Americans. We’ve all bought into the notion that debt is inevitable in America, especially if we want to own a home, buy a decent car or go to a decent college. The ease at which we willingly walk blindly into debt, though, is horrifying. Who cares if we can’t pay for that HDTV, that iPhone, that new stadium or that military occupation right this minute? Deficits don’t matter, dude. We’ll have the cash for it later. No worries.
(Speaking of iPhones, Apple Inc. has zero debt and almost $20 billion in cash reserves. Think about that the next time you pull out your Visa to get your updated iPhone…)
Well, guess what? Some people don’t have the cash right now, and as a result some of my tax dollars are funding that logo on Man United’s jersey. It was bad enough that I stopped to wonder how much of my weekly gas tank fill-up paid for Robinho’s move to Man City. Now I’m wondering when someone will twist all this into saying I must support the Red Devils now, or else I hate America.
Some Premier League clubs will fail because of this current marketplace. One of them might be a Big Four club. One of them won’t be Hull City. In fact, it could be the fiscal responsibility of Hull chairman Paul Duffen that keeps the club viable in the top flight for a long time to come — or at least until Greenland melts.
Of course, the irony of all this is that we American soccer fans wanted MLS to open up and be more like European football in terms of freedom of movement. Hearing the FA talk of salary caps now, though, makes me wonder if English football is going to strive to be more like MLS. The grass is always greener, especially when our bank accounts aren’t.
RSS Feed
Yes, I believe that the salary cap has been needed for a long period of time, it is ridiculous that teams have to spend over £2 billion on player salaries alone. It seems now that teams are willing to leverage huge amount of money for useless midfielders like Ballack which add nothing to the game itself. Let the play run the game, not money.
When they twist not rooting for Man U into an act of unpatriotism, I’ll gladly stand up and yell “NEWCASTLE TILL I DIE!”
(relegated or not, their my club)
It will be interesting to see how this market crush affects European football. Its an anything goes type of market and it almost seems that the transfer window is more exciting than the EPL season. Hull is having a nice season now, but does anyone expect them to displace any of the Big 4 come seasons’ end? Player salaries are ridiculous, and maybe a push for fiscal responsibility in the FA will help close the gap between the Big 4 and the other 16 clubs.
Of course if you don’t have to pay players you can ignore all these issues
http://www.sbpost.ie/post/pages/p/story.aspx-qqqt=IRELAND-qqqm=news-qqqid=36108-qqqx=1.asp
“Of course, the irony of all this is that we American soccer fans wanted MLS to open up and be more like European football in terms of freedom of movement.”
Some American soccer fans, maybe. But not all of us, not by a long shot.
The reality is different in the USA from the situation in Europe; there’s almost always rich people willing to step in and bail out football clubs in Europe. American soccer clubs don’t have that luxury.
That’s why from the 1890s through the 1990s soccer in the USA was in a constant process of reinventing the wheel, each time a league would fail and then we would have to start over from scratch. We can’t afford to keep doing that. European football doesn’t have this history or this problem.
Do any leagues in Europe have a salary cap? If the English Premier League decides to mimic MLS, but other leagues do not, won’t that pretty much eliminate top players from coming to England? I’m learning a little more about MLS and one thing I like is the designated player rule (assuming I’m understanding it correctly). You’re allowed to go nuts and spend as much as you want on one player and it doesn’t count towards your cap. Couldn’t this work with UEFA? It doesn’t seem feasible for UEFA to keep a team out of Champions League that qualifies performance-wise. Maybe something similar to the designated player rule could work for all leagues affiliated with UEFA.
[...] new every time. His analysis and writing is both entertaining and informative. His current article, “Fiscal Responsiblity,” examines the financial state of the English Premier League. Truly great stuff on this site, no [...]
[...] new every time. His analysis and writing is both entertaining and informative. His current article, “Fiscal Responsiblity,” examines the financial state of the English Premier League. Truly great stuff on this site, no [...]